Conspicuous Compassion and Taxation: A Reality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2018.7.3.1469Keywords:
Conspicuous Compassion, Taxation, Reality, Inequality, Evasion To EvasionAbstract
In modern public-finance literature, many canons or principles have been followed for tax policies, ‘ability principle’ (Pigou, 1933), ‘benefit principle’ (Lindahl as cited by Roberts, J, 1989). Under the benefit theory, tax levels are automatically determined and therefore self-loaded, because taxpayers pay proportionately for the government benefits they receive. In other words, the individuals who benefit the most from public services pay most of the taxes (Lindahl model,). The present paper highlights that conspicuous compassion and taxation go hand in hand especially in case of rich people but not in case of poor people and as result in modern societies tax levels are not self-loaded, a claim made by benefit principle. Along with proportionate benefit principle ‘conspicuous compassion in favour of rich people’ is also in operation in most countries of the world. This paper argues that under proportionate benefit principle with conspicuous compassion in favour of rich, the rich people are gainers as compared to the poor people. Under this principle with compassion in favour of rich, benefits of rich outweigh their costs because rich sections of the society are usually provided with large invisible services by the government such as large tax incentives and rebates. On the other hand, the costs of poor people usually outweigh their benefits because poor sections of the society are usually provided with low or no invisible services, although, they are provided with large visible benefits. But these visible benefits provided to the poor people by the government get distributed among vast section of the population.In this process, the societies end with a highly inequitable distribution of income and a paradox emerges which may rightly called as paradox of evasion-to-evasion. To improve income distribution and to control evasion-to-evasion paradox, the present study advices governments to implement progressive taxation with conspicuous compassion in favour of poor and downtrodden sections of the society. By doing this, those who will benefit more (i.e. poor) will have to pay less taxes as it ensures that large invisible services are to be provided to the poor as compared to the rich and hence the principle can be called as proportionate principle with compassion or simply conspicuous compassion taxation principle.
References
Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). London: Macmillan and Co. Retrieved from http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/marshall-principles-of-economics-8th-ed.
Adams, C. (1993). For Good and Evil: The Impact of Taxes on the Course of Civilization. Madison Books.
Baumol, W., & Bradford, D. (1970). Optimal Departures from Marginal Cost Pricing. The American Economic Review, 60, 265–283.
Bird, M. R. (2003). Taxation in Latin America: Reflections on Sustainability and the Balance between Equity and Efficiency. Retrieved from https://www.cepal.org/ilpes/noticias/paginas/4/15434/03.06RBird.TributoLatinosEficEqui.doc.
Blumgart, J. (2011). 4 Ways Government Policy Favours Rich and Keeps the Rest of Us Poor. Alternet. Retrieved from https://www.alternet.org/story/152284/4_ways_government_policy_favors_the_rich_and_keeps_the_rest_of_us_poor.
Bush, G. (1988). Acceptance Speech. New Orleans, LA. Time in length, 49, 05. Retrieved from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/nomination.php.
Dalton, H. (1920). The measurement of the inequality of income. Economic Journal, 30(119), 348-361.
Burg, D. F. (2004). A World History of Tax Rebellions. ISBN 9780415924986.
Furman, J. (2014). Poverty and the Tax Code. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, (32). Retrieved from https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/32/poverty-and-the-tax-code/.
Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of Political Economy (W.J. Ashley, Ed.). London: Longmans Green, 1917.
Persson, J. T., & Tabellini, G. (2000). Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). Retrieved from https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-us-government-and-politics/foundations-of-american-democracy/constitutional-interpretations-of-federalism/a/mcculloch-v-maryland-1819.
Messere, K. C., & Owens, J. P. (1985). International Comparisons of Tax Levels: Pitfalls and Insights. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/tax/public-finance/35589632.pdf.
New Internationalist: The World unspun (2008). A short history of Taxation. Tax Justice, October, (416). Retrieved from https://newint.org/issues/2008/10/01.
Petty, W. (1662). A Treatise of Taxes and Contributions. London.
Philippines, & De, L. H. S. (2002). The Corporation Code of the Philippines annotated. Manila, Philippines: Published and distributed by Rex Book Store.
Pigou, A. C. (1933). The Economics of Welfare. The Economic Journal, 43(170), Wiley, DOI: 10.2307/2224491.
Piketty, T., & Qian, N. (2009). Income Inequality and Progressive Income Taxation in China and India, 1986-2015. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1 (2), 53-63.
Ramsey, F. P. (1927). A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation. Economic Journal, 37, 47–61.
Roberts, J. (1989). Lindahl Equilibrium. In Eatwell J., Milgate M., Newman P. (Eds.), General Equilibrium. The New Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Rothbard, M. (1970). Power and Market: Government and the Economy, 65.
Saez, E. (2001). Using Elasticities to Derive Optimal Income Tax Rates. Review of Economic Studies, 68, 105–229. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00166.
Slemrod, J. (1990). Optimal taxation and optimal tax systems. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(1), 158. doi:10.3386/w3038.
Seligman, E. R. A. (1913). Essays in Taxation. London: Macmillan.
Sommerfel et al. (1992). Concepts of Taxation. Dryden Press: Fort Worth, TX.
Taxes in the Ancient World (2002). University of Pennsylvania Almanac, 48(28). Retrieved from https://almanac.upenn.edu/archive/v48/n28/AncientTaxes.html.
The Community Tool Box. (n. d.). Using Tax Incentives to Support Community Health and Development, Section 3, Chapter 25. Retrieved from https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/implement/changing-policies/tax-incentives/main.
Yadav, P. T. (2013). The Myth of Jizya. Journal of Indian Research, 1(2), 32-37. Retrieved from http://mujournal.mewaruniversity.in/JIR2/5.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.