Transformative Change for Women Farmers in Sambalpur: ORMAS’s Role in Enhancing Socio-Economic Empowerment

Authors

  • Jyothi Prakash Mohanty NRLM-Resource Cell, NIRDPR, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • Vanishree Joseph Centre for Gender Studies and Development, NIRDPR, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
  • Bipin Rout ORMAS Head Quarters, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • Ashutosh Dhami NRLM-Resource Cell, NIRDPR, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70112/arss-2024.13.2.4280

Keywords:

Women Empowerment, Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs), Chilli Value Chain, Socio-Economic Development, Rural Entrepreneurship

Abstract

The agricultural sector in India, predominantly sustained by smallholder farmers, has increasingly focused on empowering women to drive rural economic growth and sustained social transformation. However, persistent challenges include limited access to land, finance, and markets, alongside gender norms that further restrict women farmers’ economic potential. In response, ORMAS has implemented several initiatives in the Sambalpur district to enhance the socio-economic status of women farmers by focusing on skill development, entrepreneurial training, and institutional support through Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) and self-help groups (SHGs). This study examines the transformative impact of the Odisha Rural Development and Marketing Society’s (ORMAS) interventions on the chilli value chain in Sambalpur. It focuses on empowering rural women through FPOs, identifies ongoing challenges limiting their growth, and proposes strategies to strengthen these interventions for sustainable development. Additionally, it explores how ORMAS’s initiatives contribute to reshaping traditional gender roles and promoting inclusive community development. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study draws on both qualitative data from field observations and interviews with women farmers, as well as secondary sources detailing ORMAS’s ongoing projects. ORMAS’s interventions have led to notable improvements in women’s participation in agricultural entrepreneurship, enabling them to diversify their income through value-added products and promoting greater social recognition. The establishment of FPOs and improved market linkages have empowered women with collective bargaining power and access to new markets. Results indicate a significant increase in household income and yield per hectare, attributable to enhanced access to quality inputs, training in sustainable agricultural practices, and direct market linkages with corporate buyers like Bharat Masala. However, challenges such as limited access to land, credit, and leadership roles in community institutions persist, affecting women’s ability to fully maximize these opportunities. The study underscores the importance of building social capital, adopting gender-sensitive policy environments, and forming strategic partnerships. These actions are crucial for empowering women as agents of change within broader rural development frameworks and for the continued success of ORMAS’s initiatives.

References

Agarwal, B. (2018). Gender challenges: Volume 1: Agriculture, technology and gender equality. Oxford University Press.

Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., & Swinnen, J. (2019). Agrifood value chain revolutions in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(3), 823-902.

Bedford, K. (2024). Gender and development in the World Bank: An evaluation of the business case for equality. In The Elgar companion to the World Bank (pp. 227-238). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Chant, S., & Sweetman, C. (2019). Fixing women or fixing the world? ‘Smart economics,’ efficiency approaches, and gender equality in development. Gender & Development, 27(2), 215-230.

Cornwall, A. (2018). Beyond ‘empowerment lite’: Women’s empowerment, neoliberal development, and global justice. Feminist Review, 119(1), 124-144.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Elson, D. (2016). Economic crises from the 1980s to the 2010s: A gender analysis. In K. A. Ocampo & A. Durán-Palma (Eds.), Global governance and rules for the post-2015 era: Addressing emerging issues (pp. 241-258). United Nations Development Programme.

FAO. (2020). The state of food and agriculture 2020: Overcoming water challenges in agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Kabeer, N. (2016). Gender equality, economic growth, and women’s agency: The “endless variety” and “monotonous similarity” of patriarchal constraints. Feminist Economics, 22(1), 295-321.

Kabeer, N., & Subrahmanian, R. (2017). Institutions, relations and outcomes: A framework and case studies for gender-aware planning. Zed Books.

Khan, A., & Singh, A. K. (2023). The relevance of food processing industry in women empowerment: A case study of Prayagraj district in India. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 12(1), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2023.12.1.3315

Kumar, P., Manaswi, B. H., Prakash, P., Anbukkani, P., Kar, A., Jha, G. K., ... & Lenin, V. (2019). Impact of farmer producer organization on organic chilli production in Telangana, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge (IJTK), 19(1), 33-43.

Miglani, K., & Kaur, M. (2023). Gender equality: A key to a nation’s success. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 12(1), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2023.12.1.3288

NABARD. (2021). Case studies of farmer producer organizations in India (2019-21). National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.

Shaijan, A. (2019). Economic bloom: A progressive empowerment of women in Indian economy. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 8(S1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2019.8.S1.1504

Verma, N. (2019). Gender stereotypes in occupational pattern. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 8(2), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2019.8.2.1586

Downloads

Published

06-11-2024

How to Cite

Mohanty, J. P., Joseph, V., Rout, B., & Dhami, A. (2024). Transformative Change for Women Farmers in Sambalpur: ORMAS’s Role in Enhancing Socio-Economic Empowerment. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 13(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.70112/arss-2024.13.2.4280