Communicative-Expressive-Creative Machines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2017.6.1.1366Keywords:
Artificial communication, artificial creativity, artificial writers, meta-authorship, robotic artAbstract
The paper has a theoretical part and an applied one. The theoretical part covers the four first sections. The first section makes a historical overview over text automatization. The second section introduces a more cooperative relation between man-machine productions. The third section approaches such cooperation into writing. The fourth section is the link to the communicative-expressive-creative machines, and presents the way communication is modeled by social scholars. Differently, the applied part of the paper has five sections. The fifth section depicts how computer science scholars model communication, its origin and evolution, while the sixth section shows experiments with communicative robots. The seventh section works with the artificial creativity, whereas the eighth section brings examples of artificial artists. The final section deals with a more specific project, artificial writing.
References
Matuck, A., Ferreira Jr, A., Brasil, I., & Stuani, R. (2015). Media design as a creative language, the artists as meta-artists. In: 21st International Symposium on Electronic Art (ISEA), Vancouver, CA.
Aguado, J. M. (2004). Modelos básicos para el estudio de la comunicación colectiva. Universidad de Murcia. Retrieved from http://www.um.es/tic/Txtguia/TCtema9.pdf
Rodrigo, M. (1995). Modelos de la comunicación. In: Portal de la Comunicación. Barcelona, UAB. Retrieved from http://www.oficinappc.ucr.ac.cr/HA2073/Modelos_Comunicacin_Humana.pdf
Galantucci, B. (2005). An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. In: Cognitive Science, 29, 737-767.
Nolfi, S. (2005). Emergence of communication in embodied agents: co-adapting communicative and non-communicative behaviors. In: Connection Science, 17(3-4), 231-248.
Marocco, D., Cangelosi, A., & Nolfi, S. (2003). The role of social and cognitive factors in the emergence of communication: experiments in evolutionary robotics. In: Philosofical Transactions of the Royal Society London, 361, 2397-2421.
Floreano, D., Mitri, S., Magnenat, S. (2007). Evolutionary conditions for the emergence of communication in robots. In: Current Biology, 17, 514-519.
Lipson, H. (2007). Evolutionary robotics: emergence of communication. In: Current Biology, 17(9), 330-332.
Yanco, H. A. (1994). Robot communication: issues and implementations. Master Thesis. MIT, Massachusetts, USA.
Noble, J., & Cliff, D. (1996). On simulating the evolution of communication. In: P. Maes (Eds.) From animals to animats 4. 4th International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, Cambridge, USA.
MacLennan, B. J., & Burghardt, G. M. (1993). Synthetic ethology and the evolution of cooperative communication. In: Adaptative Behavior, 2(2), 161-188.
Kozima, H., & Yano, H. (2001). A robot that learns to communicate with human caregivers. In: First International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics, 47–52.
Iwahashi, N., Sugiura, K., Taguchi, R., Nagai, T., Taniguchi, T. (2010). Robots that learn to communicate: a developmental approach to personally and physically situated human-robot conversations. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Dialog with Robots, Arlington, USA, 38-43.
Boden, M. A. (2000). State of the art: computer models of creativity. In: The Psychologist, 13(2), 72-77.
Bridy, A. (2012). Coding creativity: copyright and the artificially intelligent author. In: Law Review 5, Stanford.
Pease, A., Colton, S., Smaill, A., & Lee, J. (2002). Lakatos and machine creativity. In: European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2002), Lyon, France.
Dzeroski, S., Langley, P., & Todorovski, L. (2007). Computational discovery of communicable scientific knowledge. In: S. Dzeroski, L. Todorovski (Eds.), Computational Discovery, LNAI 4660, 1–14.
Bridewell, W., & Langley, P. (2010). Two kinds of knowledge in scientific discovery. In: Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 36–52.
Langley, P. (2013). Computational discovery of scientific models: guiding search with knowledge and data. Inaugural Lecture at the University of Auckland, NZ.
Moulin, J-P. (2000). Self programming machines (I). Retrieved from http://www.self-programming-machines.org/pdf/sfbt4.pdf
Nivel, E., & Thórisson, K. R. (2009). Self-programming: operationalizing autonomy. In: 2nd Conference on Artificial General Intelligence, Arlington, VA, USA.
Moulin, J-P. (1992). Modifiable automata self-modifying automata. In: Acta Biotheoretica, 40(2-3), 195-204.
Zykov, V., Mytilinaios, E., Adams, B., & Lipson, H. (2005). Robotics: self-reproducing machines. In: Nature, 435, 163-164.
Lucas, C. (2005). Self-organization and human robots. In: International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2(1), 64-70.
Reynolds, C. J., & Cassinelli, A. (2009). Machine self-sacrifice. In: Eighth International Conference of Computer Ethics, Corfu, Greece.
Sundararajan, L. (2014). Mind, machine, and creativity: an artist's perspective. In: The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 136–151.
Moroni, A., Zuben, F. V., & Manzolli, J. (2002). ArTbitration: human-machine interaction in artistic domains. In: Leonardo, 35(2), 185-188.
Strycker, J. (2012). Artificial intelligence and the arts. In: Createquity. Retrieved from http://createquity.com/2012/10/artificial-intelligence-and-the-arts/
Colton, S., & Wiggins, G. A. (2012). Computational creativity: the final frontier? In: European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montpellier, France.
Cromwell, E., Galeota-Sprung, J., & Ramanujan, R. (2015). Computational creativity in the culinary arts. In: 28th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, 38-42.
Gemeinboeck, P., & Saunders, R. (2013). Creative machine performance: computational creativity and robotic art. In: Fourth International Conference on Computational Creativity, 215-219.
Boden, M. A. (2009). Computer models of creativity. In: AI Magazine, 30(3), 23–34.
Dupej, H. (2012). Next generation literary machines: the “dynamics network aesthetic” of contemporary poetry generators. PhD Thesis, University of Calgary.
Voisen, S. E. (2010). Computational generation of dream-like narrative: reflections on the uncanny dream machine. Master Thesis, University of California.
Bringsjord, S., & Ferrucci, D. A. (2000). Artificial intelligence and literary creativity: inside the mind of Brutus, a storytelling machine. In: Computational Linguistics, 26(4), 642-647.
Jaya, A. (2010). A pragmatic approach towards automatic story generation and reasoning. PhD Thesis, University Chennai.
Andersen, C. U., & Pold, S. B. (2014). Post-digital books and disruptive literary machines. In: Formules, 18, 164-183.
Schäfer, J. (2006). Literary machines made in Germany. German proto-cybertexts from the baroque era to the present. In: M. Eskelinen, R. Koskimaa (Eds.), Ergodic Histories. Cybertext yearbook 2006, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Carlson, M. (2015). The robotic reporter – automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms, and journalistic authority. In: Digital Journalism, 3(3), 416-431.
Eskelinen, M., & Koskimaa, R. (Eds.) (n.d.). CyberText Yearbook. University of Jusväskylä, Finland. Retrieved from http://cybertext.hum.jyu.fi/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
