Artificial Intelligence and Socialization: Impact on Young Students Social Interactions and Cultural Dynamics

Authors

  • Jharendra Bishwakarma Department of Sociology, Spicer Adventist University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Vishal Jhadav Department of Sociology, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70112/arss-2025.14.2.4312

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Education, Socialization, Hybrid Learning, Digital Socialization, Education Technology

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence has recently become synonymous with any technology, be it in any field; the paradigm shift is being observed in every sector, and the ongoing discourse is being dominated by this talk. With its growing influence on individuals and, as a whole, on society, it is imperative to reflect on its outcomes. The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in the education sector has been transforming the traditional learning and socialization process, and it is also presenting concerns. This paper dives into a primary understanding of AI technology, specifically its influence on the development of young students in terms of social interactions and cultural dynamics. This paper studied the AI’s influence on socialization and cultural dynamics through the lens of Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and Bandura’s social learning theory. While the analysis reveals that AI does enhance personal learning and global collaborations, there is a risk of a reduction in face-to-face interactions, which could weaken skills such as empathy and nonverbal communication. Further, the finding also suggests that AI facilitates cross-cultural exposure, but there is a possible risk of cultural homogenization, which could marginalize the homegrown traditions. Data privacy, algorithmic bias, and social isolation are the other areas of concern that would further complicate AI’s role in education.

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

Broussard, M. (2018). Artificial unintelligence: How computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press.

Frey, T. (2023, April 27). The difference between human creativity and generative AI creativity. Artificial Intelligence. https://futuristspeaker.com/artificial-intelligence/the-difference-between-human-creativity-and-generative-ai-creativity/.

Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2017). Sociology (8th ed.). Polity Press.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., & Koedinger, K. R. (2021). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(1), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1.

HP Online Store. (2025, January 31). AI vs human creativity: A comprehensive analysis | HP® Tech Takes - India. https://www.hp.com/in-en/shop/tech-takes/post/ai-vs-human-creativity-comparison.

Hu, S. (2024). The effect of artificial intelligence-assisted personalized learning on student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis based on 31 empirical research papers. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 24(1), 3873–3894. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.24.re395.

Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., & Stadler, M. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

Lemay, D. J., Baek, C., & Doleck, T. (2021). Comparison of learning analytics and educational data mining: A topic modeling approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100016.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.

Lukin, G. (2020). Prescriptive methods for adaptive learning (Master’s thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Miller, B., & Morris, R. G. (2016). Virtual peer effects in social learning theory. Crime & Delinquency, 62(12), 1543–1569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128714526499.

Newblom, M. (2024, November 25). AI vs. human: Creativity, abilities, and skills in 2025 (Which is better?) Fiverr. https://www.fiverr.com/resources/guides/business/ai-vs-human.

Nickerson, C. (2024, February 13). Understanding socialization in sociology. SimplyPsychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/socialization.html.

Ouyang, F., Xu, W., & Cukurova, M. (2023). An artificial intelligence-driven learning analytics method to examine the collaborative problem-solving process from the complex adaptive systems perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09387-z.

Schwanke, A. (2024, July 19). Generative AI and the illusion of originality: Can machines ever truly create? Medium. https://medium.com/@axel.schwanke/generative-ai-never-truly-creative-68a0189d98e8.

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2012). Granny and the robots: Ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9234-6.

Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press.

UNESCO. (2023). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350.

Varsik, S., & Vosberg, L. (2024). The potential impact of artificial intelligence on equity and inclusion in education (OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 23). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/15df715b-en.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wentzel, K. R. (2017). Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (2nd ed., pp. 586–603). Guilford Press.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.

Downloads

Published

05-12-2025

How to Cite

Bishwakarma, J., & Jhadav, V. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Socialization: Impact on Young Students Social Interactions and Cultural Dynamics. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 14(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.70112/arss-2025.14.2.4312

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.